Solutions

Packaged workflows for document-heavy decisions.

Powered by DocuPrism, we automate the high-volume parts of claims, investigations, contracts, vendor risk, and compliance — so your team focuses on the judgment calls.

Where Solutions fit

Four lenses for document-heavy decisions.

Most regulated, evidence-driven workflows fall into one of four shapes. Each one has a different technical centre of gravity — but the same end-to-end pattern: documents in, structured intelligence out, decision made with an audit trail.

01

When documents need to become usable data

Key information is trapped in PDFs, forms, emails, reports, and spreadsheets — and teams are still extracting it manually.

  • Pulling vendor, invoice, policy, contract, or claims data into business systems
  • Extracting obligations, dates, and parties from contracts
  • Turning document collections into structured case, vendor, asset, or project records
  • Capturing tables, line items, and document fields for downstream automation
02

When decisions depend on evidence across documents

A decision cannot be made from one document alone. The answer depends on connecting evidence spread across multiple files.

  • Assessing whether a claim is covered based on the policy, claim form, and medical report
  • Checking whether a supplier satisfies onboarding or tender requirements using certificates, declarations, and contracts
  • Determining whether an obligation was met by comparing clauses, emails, and status reports
  • Finding which active contracts are exposed because a vendor certificate expired
03

When the hidden story matters

The important signal is not obvious in any one document. It emerges only when entities, events, and timelines are connected.

  • Reconstructing how a fraud case unfolded across claims, emails, reports, and payments
  • Identifying suspicious relationships between doctors, clinics, claimants, and repeated incidents
  • Tracing ownership, control, or exposure across multiple entities and documents
  • Surfacing unusual patterns, clusters, or central actors that suggest risk or fraud
04

When AI needs answers you can trust

The answer is high-stakes, so users need to see where it came from and why the system reached that conclusion.

  • Explaining why a compliance breach, exception, or claim decision was flagged
  • Showing the exact contract clause, email, report, or form that supports an answer
  • Giving AI outputs with provenance, evidence chains, and audit trails
  • Supporting regulated workflows where teams must verify answers before acting

Named solutions

Specific decisions. Specific pipelines.

These aren't generic "AI for X" pitches. Each one is a specific evidence → graph → decision pipeline built for regulated, evidence-driven work — and tailored to the client's deployment, security, and integration needs.

How they're built

Three layers. One deployment.

Layer 1

Document intelligence

DocuPrism turns the messy documents at the heart of the decision into reliable, computable data — with traceable evidence for every value.

Layer 2

Workflow orchestration

Production-grade engines (Camunda, n8n) wire the pipeline together. Routing, review queues, escalations, and integrations with your existing systems.

Layer 3

Decision-tailored UI

Investigators, assessors, and reviewers don't want a generic dashboard. We design the UI around the specific decision they're making.

Deployed inside your cloud, your security boundary, or on-prem — see DocuPrism deployment options.

Have a specific decision pipeline in mind?

Tell us the documents, the decision, and the constraints — we'll tell you the shape of the Solution we'd build.

Talk to us →